I am very concerned at the blogosphere being alive this evening with repostes, or worse, of Mark Driscoll's comments on UK Pastors and Teachers. None of which will make a jot of difference to anyone else's opinion - and all of which will confirm what the world thinks of the Church.
Sorry Lord!
There are surely bigger concerns that merit our thought, attention, time and endeavour? Poverty, our neighbours suffering, the persecuted Church .... Etc.
Who are you? I have never been a great fan of labels when it comes to describing members of the body of Christ. eg. he is anglican, she is Baptist, they are Charismatic, etc. etc. I remember once causing a man to become increasingly hot under the collar when he asked me who I was? To which I replied I was a disciple (follower) of Jesus. He was meaning which Church did I attend (presumably so he could classify me and decide whether I was bona fide or not) and my answer did not bring him peace, but I refused to go any further. Why? Because, as I said, I am not a great fan of labels, but also because for me there is a very important distinction between primarily identifying myself with Jesus and identifying myself with Church. Of course, I recognise that by becoming a follower of Jesus I become part of the body of Christ, but that can be very distinct from being a member of a Church. To me this is the crucial difference between vibrant faith and dusty religion. ...
Comments
Post a Comment
Feel free to add comments or ask questions: